David Jones of EEVBlog.com Reviews the Gossen Metrawatt METRAHIT ENERGY

The METRAHIT ENERGY is a compact, single phase Power and Power Quality meter/logger that includes multimeter functions.  It is intended for measuring AC and DC voltage, as well as current in single-phase systems, with current being measured either directly or via a current transformer. 

With a resolution of 60,000 digits, the METRAHIT ENERGY has more than 35 different measuring functions including: active power, reactive power, apparent power, power factor and energy.  This powerful multimeter is extremely rugged and reliable with a housing made of impact resistant ABS. 


Click on the link below and see the METRAHIT ENERGY in action: 


AA Alkaline Battery Capacity Measurement

Check out the METRAHIT ENERGY teardown by David Jones.

METRAHIT ENERGY

METRAHIT ENERGY Features:

• Digital hand-held multimeter with TRMS measurement
• Power measurement (W, VAR, VA, PF): active, reactive and apparent power, power factor
•  Energy measurement (Wh, VARh, VAh): active, reactive and apparent energy, mean power value with adjustable observation period, and maximum value
• Power Quality Analysis: recording of over and under-voltage,sags/dips, swells, voltage peaks, and transients in 50 and 60Hz systems
•  Harmonic analysis: RMS values and distortion components up to the 15th harmonic at 16.7, 50, 60, and 400Hz
•  Special measuring functions: crest factor CF, conductivity nS, low resistance RSL, duty cycle %, cable length
•  Resolution of 60,000 digits, triple backlit display
• 1KHz / –3 dB low-pass filter available
• Direct current measurement from 10nA to 10A, 16A for less than 30 seconds, current measurement with current transformer clamp and sensors, transformation ratio is taken into account on the display
•  Large data memory for up to 300,000 measured values Instrument is completely remote controllable using PC software, without using the unit’s rotary switch



For more information about this and other safety and measurement

products, visit www.gossenmetrawattusa.com.

Dranetz Case Study: Broadcast Studio Loses Video in Prime Time

In late 2011, a major broadcast company had a power outage that dropped live and pre-recorded television programming for 1½ hours to approximately 1/3 of the United States during the prime time viewing period.  The company lost vital revenue while electrical and facility engineers tried to determine the source of the problem and correct it.

Problem

After several failed attempts to restore the broadcasts, it was discovered that several new pieces of equipment had been brought online shortly before the outage.  The customer was able to restore broadcasting service by turning on all equipment except these new additions.

Upon further investigation, it was discovered that several of the electrical circuits which carry the load of the broadcast equipment were close to the maximum load rating. Adding the new equipment to these circuits was enough of a load to exceed the maximum rating, which tripped the circuit breakers and took down the entire broadcast system.  A review of the remaining facility showed that many of the electrical circuits were beyond 90% of their capacity.

Solution

The broadcast company installed three Dranetz Encore Series Branch Circuit Energy Monitoring (BCEM) systems.  The system is located in their primary broadcast distribution center and has 54 Dranetz ES210 DataNode’s.  The Dranetz BCEM and ES210’s will actively monitor the real-time loading and energy consumption across all of their primary electrical distribution circuits.  The BCEM’s were incorporated into their existing Encore Series Software server for real-time monitoring, alarming, and historical reporting of the electrical usage and patterns. In addition, the customers Building Management System (BMS) is simultaneously reading the BCEM data for redundant, centralized monitoring and alarming by the 24x7 building operational staff.

The Dranetz BCEM System (below) provides the broadcast company easy, centralized monitoring of energy, demand, power factor and much more from a single monitoring location.

"Organized Lightning" and Electrical Safety

This article found in the May 2013 Electrical Contractor was written by our own Rich Bingham.

George Carlin summed up the hazards of working with electricity quite well when he said, “Electricity is really just organized lightning.” Few people, except for some extreme golfers and Benjamin Franklin, would normally take extraordinary risks with lightning. Yet, too many electricians are still injured and killed each year on the job.

While there are sources of such incidents unrelated to electricity, including falls, vehicular accidents and tools, the unique aspects of electricity and its potential devastating effects on the human body rightly get significant attention from the safety agencies, as more than half of the fatalities are caused by exposure or contact to this hazard. In addition to electrocution, a few of the hazards that need to be considered include potential damage from radiant and convective heat (an electric arc is hotter than the sun), infrared and ultraviolet light damage to the eyes, excessive decibel levels to the ears, and pressure wave and concussive forces to external and internal body parts.

Electrical accidents are not limited to electricians. Fortunately, the figure below shows a decline for all construction workers, which is similar to the trend for all industries, declining 31 percent over the same time period.

Of the 67 deaths in 2011 from electrical contact in the construction industry, 34 were classified as electricians, along with an injury rate in 2011 of 3.6 percent to the 723,000 electricians. There are all sorts of statistics about age (fatalities over age 55 are nearly triple those under 24), season (June to September accounts for more than half of the injuries in a year), and many other categories. What matters more is why the accidents occur and how we can force that number lower.

Obviously, contact with wires is the source of the current, whether overhead, in the walls, or within equipment or tools. Strangely, it is at the power line frequencies (50–60 hertz) that the human body is most vulnerable to the amount of current; it creates a “can’t-let-go” situation. For most males, that is only 9 milliamps (mA) of alternating current, whereas it is nearly six times that for direct current, and likewise for 10 kilohertz. That is why the trip point for most ground-fault circuit interrupter (GFCI) receptacles is 5 mA.

Removing the hazard by de-energizing­ the circuit being worked on and any that could possibly be contacted is the ideal scenario, but, in some rare situations, that isn’t going to happen. Both NFPA 70E, Standard for Electrical Safety in the Workplace, and OSHA 29 CFR 1910 provide detailed information on who, what, where and how to create an electrically safe working condition. Anyone who is exposed to the hazards should know them. The following suggestions do not supersede or replace of those requirements, but rather they give brief perspective on creating them.

The overall process is to plan, do, check and act. Every company, whether a sole proprietor or a 250-person electrical contracting firm, should establish appropriate policies and practices to address worker safety. Conduct periodic training on preventive and protective measures with regard to the hazards and safe practices for all workers, no matter how many years of experience. Supervisors and co-workers should continually check that such practices are being followed and determine what corrective actions are needed. All must act to ensure that the process is continually reviewed and improved. Most workers are probably familiar with what they need to do, but cutting corners to get jobs done faster, complacency in using the proper tools and personal protective equipment, neglecting proper lockout/tagout procedures, a lack of understanding of the potential hazards, and neglecting to monitor the situation while at work are all contributing factors to accidents.

Of these factors, we have made great strides in wearing the proper PPE and understanding the arc flash hazard, which may explain a part of the declining injuries and fatalities trends. National Electrical Code 2011 Article 110.24 states that nondwelling service equipment is required to be field-marked with the amount of available fault current when installed or modified. OSHA requires that, where there is a risk of injury to a worker’s skin from fire or explosion, an employer or contractor shall provide the worker with—and require the worker to use—outer fire-resistant clothing that meets an approved industry standard and is appropriate to the risk.

Following these two requirements will minimize the damaging effects on the human body when inadvertent contact with energized circuits unleashes the “organized lightning.”

Surge Protection: Fact or Fiction?

The following article was written by Dranetz engineer Frank Kinder and is a re-print from the April 2004 issue of Electrical Contractor Magazine.

What do these statements have in common?

• Lightning doesn’t strike the same place twice.

• Electrical utilities correct a fault by sending a power surge to clear a short in a service line, transformer or other load grid short circuit.

• TVSS systems will reduce energy consumption by a minimum of 10 to 15 percent.

All three are purported to be fact by some people, even though they run contrary to reality and the laws of nature. The world is full of folklore about many different subjects, even about transient voltage surge suppression (TVSS) devices. Ads for TVSS devices claim that they will solve most power quality problems, even though sags are typically the most common PQ phenomena (as much as 60 to 70 percent) experienced in an industrial facility or residence. This doesn’t seem to affect the millions of dollars of annual sales of such mitigation devices. So, perhaps a little knowledge about such may help to make for “a more educated consumer.”

Surge protector products are primarily designed to eliminate transients (also referred to in the past as “surges”) and sold under the names of TVSS or SPD (surge protection devices). Transients are sub-cycle duration changes in the voltage and current waveforms, often measured in microseconds (millionths of a second). They are often very sneaky PQ disturbances, normally not visible to the human eye until they leave a path of destruction in their wake. They can be repetitive transients that gnaw away until causing a breakdown of insulation or components within equipment; or, they can be as dramatic as a directly coupled lightning strike, measured in tens of thousands of Amperes. By the way, lightning strikes because the potential difference in energy between two points is higher than the breakdown voltage between them. When this happens, the step leaders from the clouds and the earth make a connection that allows the massive amount of energy to traverse between the two points with the brilliant flash that people associate with lightning. This flow can happen several times in one strike, and can repeat itself later at the same place when the potential difference increases again to the breakdown or flashover point.

There is a major difference between “surge arrestors” and TVSSs. Surge Arrestors (SA) and TVSSs are treated differently by Underwriters Laboratories, as covered in UL 1449, and the National Electric Code (NEC). Surge Arrestors are generally hardwired protectors at the service entrance. The 2002 NEC allows SA-rated devices to be installed before the service disconnect [Articles 280 and 230.82(3)], with TVSS devices applicable only after the disconnect [Article 285]. In general, the SA devices are designed to withstand much larger current transients (up to 10kA). In lightning-prone areas, such as Florida, the service entrance is a very good place to install such protection. The distance between the line and neutral conductors, and the earth grounding electrodes, is probably the shortest here. Since Ohm’s and Kirchoff’s Laws still apply in the transient world, having the shortest distance would also probably yield the lowest impedance in the grounding conductor. It is here where the “unwanted” energy is going to be dumped; less impedance equals better protection

Since the “surge protector strips” are among the most prolific PQ mitigation devices out there, especially in a home or other residence, we’ll focus on those. If you open up one of the surge protector products (not recommending that you do, especially if it is electrically live), there are probably one or more of the following components: MOV (metal oxide varistors), SASD (silicon avalanche diodes), spark gaps or gas tubes, fuses, and/or filters made of inductors and capacitors. Their ability to protect your equipment is a function of what exactly is inside and how it is installed.

MOVs are devices that lower their resistance when higher voltage transients occur versus nominal line voltage (whereas a resistor is a constant impedance component). The result is that they will limit or clamp the voltage level across two points by providing a lower impedance path. They can be connected Line-to-Neutral for “normal mode” transients as well as line-to-ground and neutral-to-ground for “common mode” transients. When they absorb the transient, there is a resulting heating effect. The amount of energy (voltage ¥ current ¥ time) that they can absorb is their joule rating. The more joules, the more “heat” that they can take.

According to the Control Synergy Web site (www.controlsynergy.com.au), “While a 20mm MOV can withstand 1,000 650A 8/20 usec current pulses, it self-sacrifices as it suppresses a single 6,500A 8/20 pulse. Its surge current capacity decreases significantly as it is subjected to the more common longer duration 10/1000 usec transient current pulses.”

In general, MOVs can take more punishment than SAPD, but their clamping voltage or voltage protection level, VPL, is not a fixed value but a function of the magnitude of the transients. SAPDs are usually very fast-acting devices, measured in nanoseconds (billionths of a second). The VPL doesn’t vary with the magnitude of the voltage transients, as with the MOV. However, since it has less current-carrying capacity, it takes more of them in parallel to absorb the same joules as an MOV. They also tend to cost more than an MOV, making the overall protection equivalent a more expensive proposition.

An MOV can be subjected to continuous transients, either because of a constant source of such or because of an overvoltage condition resulting in a peak voltage above the clamping voltage. The peak voltage is typically 1.414 times the nominal rms value, as in 170Vpk for 120Vrms. This heat buildup can cause the MOV to degrade, with the “on” impedance getting smaller. Since the VPL is also a function of the current and the “on” impedance, this value can change. Eventually, this can lead to failure, and it often fails catastrophically in a near short circuit. This draws excessive amounts of current, until the leads melt off or some type of circuit protection devices opens. Rather than relying on the distribution circuit protection (breaker or fuse), it is a good idea to purchase a surge protection product with such overcurrent protection built into the product. Note that there is no visible marking difference in the UL marking for a product that passed the second edition tests versus those covered by the first edition. 

Since these devices are normally placed downstream of the electric revenue meter, it is difficult to see how they can actually save energy costs. The electrons that are diverted by the clamping devices when limiting the voltage downstream to the equipment they are protecting will still flow through the wattmeter. Energy is still being consumed, though maybe not by the equipment itself. In addition, such high-frequency disturbances are probably above the bandwidth of most wattmeters anyway, so they wouldn’t even be recorded as such. Residential electric bills are in the tens or hundreds of kilowatt-hours per month; it takes thousands of 10 usec-wide, 500V transients to result in even one kilowatt-hour.

Protecting just the electrical distribution circuits in an industrial facility or residence isn’t often adequate. Telecommunications lines, including phones and cable TV lines connected to modems and other electronic equipment, can provide a path for transients to cause damage to equipment, as well as couple into the power circuits and spread to other circuits in the facility. Similar type surge protection devices are available for them, as well as combination devices that offer protection for both.

Since the common mode protection diverts energy into the grounding conductor, it is important that this path be one of low impedance to the grounding electrodes. Having several surge protection strips daisy-chained together, or plugged into partition walls or circuits without adequate ground paths, isn’t going to do too much for you. Remember, if you are diverting a large amount of current, the impedance will result in a proportional voltage being developed across it. If some of the circuits experience this voltage rise and other parts do not, the equi-potential ground system is no longer at the same levels for equipment interconnected between such, as with a local area network or other communication interfaces. Hence, misoperation or damage may result elsewhere in the building, even if the TVSS does its job at the piece of equipment.

Correctly installing the properly rated surge protection device will go a long way to protecting your computers, HVAC controls, microwaves, answering machines and other equipment from the evil effects of transients. Of course, they wouldn’t do much for a voltage sag, as they don’t generate energy, only absorbing the potentially damaging transient instead of your equipment. And lastly, no, the electric utilities don’t generate surges to clear the lines of faults. Surges or transients can occur during fault conditions, but they are also the result of the laws of physics, not an attempt by the utility company to “clear the fault.” EC

Rich BINGHAM, a contributing editor for power quality, can be reached at 732.287.3680.

Frank KINDER is principal engineer at Dranetz performing new product research and development on present products.

Dranetz, Power Quality, Electrical Harmonics, PowerXplorer, PowerVisa, Encore, PQView, Fast Transients, Flicker, RMS Variations, Waveforms, Energy Surveys, Energy Platform EP1